{"id":6915,"date":"2026-05-18T06:53:08","date_gmt":"2026-05-18T06:53:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/?p=6915"},"modified":"2026-06-08T19:34:04","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T19:34:04","slug":"as9100d-cnc-machining-cost-2026","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/as9100d-cnc-machining-cost-2026\/","title":{"rendered":"AS9100D CNC Machining Cost: Why Aerospace Parts Cost 30\u201350% More in 2026"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">When an aerospace procurement manager receives two quotes for the same titanium bracket \u2014 one from a $58\/hr ISO 9001 shop, one from a $96\/hr AS9100D shop \u2014 the price delta is not a margin grab. It is a quality-system tax that the procurement manager will pay either at quote-time or at root-cause-time after a non-conformance hits an assembly. We have audited dozens of aerospace programs where buyers tried to save 35% by routing through a non-AS9100D supplier and ended up paying 2\u20134\u00d7 the original savings in scrap, rework, and program delay when the part failed traceability at receiving inspection. The cost delta is real, and so is the protection it buys.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D-compliant <a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/cnc-machining\/\">Usinage CNC<\/a> typically prices 30\u201350% above the same part made under ISO 9001 alone, with the gap widening on ITAR or DFARS-flagged components. This guide walks aerospace procurement and supplier qualification managers through what AS9100D actually costs on a per-part basis, where the money goes, and the four levers that move aerospace CNC pricing in 2026 \u2014 without compromising compliance.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What AS9100D Adds to a CNC Quote That ISO 9001 Does Not<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D is ISO 9001 plus aerospace-specific requirements layered on top. The shop that holds AS9100D must demonstrate, document, and pass surveillance audits on processes that ISO 9001 alone does not require \u2014 and every one of those processes adds cost to every part that passes through the floor.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The specific additions, in order of cost impact:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Full material traceability per AS9100D 8.5.2 \u2014 every bar, plate, and forging must trace to a verified heat with chemistry and mechanical certs retained for the part&#8217;s service life<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First-article inspection per AS9102 \u2014 Form 1, 2, and 3 documentation on every new part number or after any process change<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Counterfeit parts prevention program (AS5553-compliant) \u2014 qualified distributor lists, certificate verification, and incoming inspection of all flight-critical material<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Configuration management \u2014 every revision change to a drawing requires a documented MRB (Material Review Board) decision on any in-process inventory<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Foreign Object Debris (FOD) prevention program \u2014 clean-floor protocols, lint-free wipes, segregated wash areas<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Risk-based thinking documentation on every process change, supplier change, and tooling change<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Each of those processes consumes labor hours that ISO 9001 work does not. The cumulative effect is a 12\u201318% overhead burden that an AS9100D shop must absorb across every part \u2014 which is why the hourly rate sits 25\u201335% above commercial CNC rates before any aerospace-specific machining is even quoted.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>AS9100D CNC Hourly Rates in 2026: Real Numbers Across Regions<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Hourly rate alone is a misleading benchmark for aerospace work because the rate includes the quality-system overhead, the labor premium for aerospace-experienced machinists, and the equipment amortization on calibrated five-axis cells running at tighter tolerances than commercial work.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th><b>Region \/ Tier<\/b><\/th>\n<th><b>Hourly Rate (US$\/hr)<\/b><\/th>\n<th><b>Quality System<\/b><\/th>\n<th><b>D\u00e9lai de livraison habituel<\/b><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Commercial CNC \u2014 US shop<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$58\u2013$95\/hr<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ISO 9001 or none<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3\u20135 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D CNC \u2014 US Midwest\/Southeast<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$95\u2013$155\/hr<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">5\u20138 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D CNC \u2014 US West Coast\/Northeast<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$115\u2013$185\/hr<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6\u20139 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D + ITAR + DFARS \u2014 US<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$125\u2013$210\/hr<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D + ITAR + DFARS<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">7\u201310 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D CNC \u2014 EU<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$98\u2013$165\/hr<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D \/ EN 9100<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">6\u201310 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rapid Precision (AS9100D \/ ISO 9001 \/ ITAR registered)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$85\u2013$135\/hr equivalent<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D + ISO 9001 + ITAR<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">4\u20136 weeks<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Two numbers inside the rate matter more than the rate itself: scrap rate and first-pass yield. An ISO 9001 shop at $58\/hr running a 7% scrap rate on titanium effectively costs $62\/hr in finished parts. An AS9100D shop at $96\/hr running a 1.2% scrap rate costs $97\/hr in finished parts \u2014 and the AS9100D shop also delivers full traceability, FAI documentation, and rejection-resistant receiving inspection. The price gap closes faster than the rate sheet suggests.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Our <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/cnc-milling\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraisage CNC<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> et <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/cnc-turning\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CNC turning<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> operations both run dedicated AS9100D cells with calibrated probing, in-process SPC, and full material traceability \u2014 the cost premium is built into the floor, not added at quote time.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What FAI (First Article Inspection) Actually Costs in 2026<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First Article Inspection under AS9102 is the single most-misunderstood line item on an aerospace CNC quote. Many procurement managers assume it is a $200 inspection \u2014 it is not. A full AS9102 FAI on a 40-feature aerospace bracket commonly runs $600\u2013$2,400 depending on scope, and it must be re-run after any drawing revision, any process change, any supplier change of significance, or any extended production gap.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FAI cost breakdown for a typical aerospace machined part:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CMM programming and run time \u2014 $180\u2013$520<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Surface finish, hardness, and dimensional gauge checks \u2014 $90\u2013$240<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Material certification verification and Form 2 documentation \u2014 $120\u2013$280<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Form 3 ballooned drawing markup and dimension-by-dimension report \u2014 $180\u2013$450<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Internal QA review and customer-required signature workflow \u2014 $80\u2013$220<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">On a 25-piece prototype lot, that $600\u2013$1,500 FAI distributes to $24\u2013$60 per part \u2014 a real and reasonable cost. On a 2,000-piece production lot, it distributes to less than $1 per part \u2014 which is why aerospace economics favor production volumes once FAI is approved. Skipping FAI to save cost is not an option on flight-critical hardware; the AS9102 documentation becomes part of the airworthiness audit trail.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>ITAR and DFARS: When Aerospace Pricing Climbs Another 12\u201325%<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D alone does not address International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR) or Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) compliance. Both add another layer of cost on top of AS9100D baseline pricing for any defense, dual-use, or US-government-funded program.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ITAR-registered CNC suppliers must:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Register with the US Department of State <a href=\"https:\/\/www.pmddtc.state.gov\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Directorate of Defense Trade Controls<\/a><\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Restrict access to drawings and parts to US persons only \u2014 defined narrowly, with significant employment-verification overhead<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Maintain physical and digital access controls audited annually<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Provide notification before any foreign national even walks through the shop floor<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DFARS specialty-metals compliance requires that titanium, certain steels, and certain nickel alloys be melted in a DFARS-qualified country (typically US, UK, France, Germany, Japan, and a handful of others) \u2014 even if the machining itself happens domestically. DFARS-compliant Ti-6Al-4V stock typically prices 18\u201332% above standard ASTM B348 titanium because of the restricted supplier pool.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The combined effect of AS9100D + ITAR + DFARS specialty metals: typical pricing premium of 50\u201380% versus a comparable commercial ISO 9001 quote. This premium is non-negotiable for flight-critical defense components and should be modeled into BOM costs before RFQs go out.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Four Levers That Move Aerospace CNC Pricing Without Compromising Compliance<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Aerospace procurement managers have less pricing flexibility than commercial buyers, but four levers move real money on AS9100D programs without weakening the quality position.<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Award production volumes, not just prototypes \u2014 FAI cost amortizes from $40\/part at 25 pieces to under $1\/part at 2,000 pieces. Splitting prototype and production across two suppliers is the single most expensive procurement decision in aerospace machining.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standardize material call-outs across the BOM \u2014 buying 7075-T6 in one form factor across 12 part numbers buys volume pricing; spec&#8217;ing seven variants kills it. Estimated savings: 8\u201314% on material spend.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Loosen tolerances on non-flight-critical features \u2014 every feature ground to \u00b10.005 mm when \u00b10.05 mm would serve carries 25\u201340% cost overhead. The PMI traceability documentation cost is the same either way; the machining cost is not.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use multi-axis cells for envelope reduction \u2014 moving from 3-axis with 4 setups to 5-axis with 1 setup typically cuts cycle time 25\u201340% and removes 3 setup-error opportunities from the FAI. Our <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/5-axis-cnc\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Usinage CNC 5 axes<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> capacity covers this consolidation.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Each of these levers is compatible with AS9100D, ITAR, and DFARS compliance. None requires relaxing the quality position. All four together routinely produce 18\u201328% total cost reduction on a stable aerospace BOM versus the buyer&#8217;s incumbent pricing.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>The Rapid Precision Aerospace CNC Cost Framework<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use this framework when modeling AS9100D CNC costs into an aerospace BOM. Each row carries a real numeric anchor.<\/span><\/p>\n<table>\n<thead>\n<tr>\n<th><b>Cost Driver<\/b><\/th>\n<th><b>Numeric Anchor<\/b><\/th>\n<th><b>Lever Available<\/b><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D quality overhead vs ISO 9001<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">12\u201318% built-in burden<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Not negotiable; do not erode by routing off-AS9100D<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">FAI cost per part (AS9102)<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">$24\u2013$60 at 25 pcs; &lt;$1 at 2,000 pcs<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Award production volumes, not just prototypes<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">DFARS specialty-metal premium<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+18\u201332% on Ti and Ni alloys<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Standardize across BOM to amortize<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">ITAR registration overhead<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">+8\u201315% across all parts at the shop<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use ITAR-registered supplier only when actually required<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tolerance over-specification<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">\u00b10.005 mm vs \u00b10.05 mm = 25\u201340% cost<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Tighten only flight-critical features<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">3-axis vs 5-axis cycle time<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">25\u201340% cycle time reduction on complex envelopes<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Spec 5-axis for \u22654-setup parts<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Annual surveillance audit pass rate<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">First-pass with no major findings<\/span><\/td>\n<td><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Disqualify suppliers with open major NCRs &gt;90 days<\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Questions fr\u00e9quemment pos\u00e9es<\/b><\/p>\n<p><b>How much more does AS9100D CNC machining cost than ISO 9001?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">The typical premium is 30\u201350% on hourly rate and 25\u201345% on a per-part basis once volume and FAI amortization are factored in. The gap widens to 50\u201380% on parts that also require ITAR registration and DFARS specialty-metals compliance. The premium is not optional on flight-critical hardware \u2014 AS9100D is the entry-level quality system for aerospace primes \u2014 but it can be optimized by awarding production volumes, standardizing materials, and avoiding tolerance over-specification. Below 25 pieces, the FAI amortization makes prototype pricing look especially heavy, which is why aerospace economics favor consolidated production awards.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the typical AS9100D CNC hourly rate in the United States in 2026?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D-compliant US CNC shops in the Midwest and Southeast typically quote $95\u2013$155 per hour. Shops on the West Coast and Northeast commonly run $115\u2013$185 per hour, driven by labor cost differentials. Adding ITAR registration and DFARS specialty-metals compliance pushes the upper bracket to $125\u2013$210 per hour. The variance inside that band reflects machine capability, calibration scope, and the depth of the shop&#8217;s aerospace experience \u2014 a 25-year aerospace job shop at $135\/hr is typically a better buy than a $98\/hr shop that picked up AS9100D in the last three years.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Do I need an ITAR-registered CNC supplier for every aerospace part?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">No. ITAR applies only to components classified under the US Munitions List (USML) \u2014 defense articles, military aircraft components, and certain dual-use technologies. Commercial aerospace work (Boeing 737, Airbus A320 family, business jets, civilian helicopters) does not require ITAR registration on its CNC suppliers. Awarding commercial aerospace work to an ITAR-registered shop adds 8\u201315% overhead without buying any additional compliance value. Verify the USML classification of your part before requiring ITAR \u2014 most commercial-aerospace structural and engine components are not USML-controlled.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>What is the difference between AS9100D and NADCAP for CNC machining?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D is a quality management system certification that applies to the supplier&#8217;s entire operation. NADCAP is a process-specific accreditation \u2014 heat treatment, non-destructive testing, chemical processing, welding \u2014 that the same supplier may hold for specific subprocesses. A CNC shop with AS9100D alone is properly certified for the machining work. NADCAP becomes relevant only when the shop also performs heat treat, NDT, or chemical processing in-house. Most CNC shops outsource those operations to NADCAP-accredited suppliers, which is the standard and acceptable pattern for AS9100D programs.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Can the AS9100D premium be reduced by sourcing from low-cost countries?<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Selectively. Several Asia-based AS9100D shops have built credible aerospace programs and typically price 35\u201355% below US AS9100D equivalents on equivalent machining work, with full FAI documentation and material traceability. The risk is supplier qualification depth \u2014 a paper AS9100D certificate is not the same as a 15-year aerospace operating history. For commercial-aerospace work without ITAR or DFARS exposure, qualified Asia-based AS9100D suppliers can be a legitimate cost reduction. For ITAR-controlled work, US-only sourcing is mandatory regardless of cost.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Bottom Line<\/b><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Three takeaways:<\/span><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">AS9100D pricing carries a real 30\u201350% premium over ISO 9001 \u2014 the premium pays for traceability, FAI, FOD prevention, and counterfeit-parts protocols that protect the program at receiving inspection.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Award production volumes, not just prototypes \u2014 FAI cost amortizes from $40\/part at 25 pcs to under $1\/part at 2,000 pcs.<\/span><\/li>\n<li style=\"font-weight: 400;\" aria-level=\"1\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Use ITAR registration only when the part is USML-controlled \u2014 adding ITAR to commercial-aerospace work costs 8\u201315% without buying compliance value.<\/span><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Rapid Precision is AS9100D, ISO 9001, and ITAR registered, with dedicated aerospace cells for <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/cnc-milling\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">Fraisage CNC<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/cnc-turning\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">CNC turning<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">, et <\/span><a href=\"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/surface-finishing\/\"><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\">surface finishing<\/span><\/a><span style=\"font-weight: 400;\"> under one quality system and one auditable supply chain.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><b>Submit your CAD files and AS9102 requirements for an aerospace DFM and quote at rapidcision.com.<\/b><\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When an aerospace procurement manager receives two quotes for the same titanium bracket \u2014 one from a $58\/hr ISO 9001 shop, one from a $96\/hr AS9100D shop \u2014 the price delta is not a margin grab. It is a quality-system tax that the procurement manager will pay either at quote-time or at root-cause-time after a [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":6916,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[11],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6915","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-cnc-machining"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6915","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6915"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6915\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7278,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6915\/revisions\/7278"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6916"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6915"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6915"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rapidcision.com\/fr\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6915"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}